Editor's notes

Corpus-wide audit of Latin/English citation alignment

Every section whose Latin and English texts cite differently is annotated. Annotations fall into four kinds. Reconciled citations are tagged Disambiguated or Promoted; observed-but-unreconciled divergences are tagged Latin-only or English-only. The same note appears on the corresponding section page under Editorial notes.

Total resolved citations: 2279. Sections with at least one editorial annotation: 302.

Disambiguated (12)

The English text used an ambiguous reference (e.g. [:em "Coroll."] where the section has more than one corollary). The build chose the specific sub-section the Latin text spells out in the same passage.

Promoted (272)

The English text cited a bare proposition; the Latin text in the same passage specifies a sub-section (demonstration, scholium, or corollary). The English link points to the Latin's specified sub-section.

Latin-only citation (147)

At this section the Latin text makes an explicit citation that Elwes's English does not render. No editorial action is taken; the divergence is preserved.

English-only citation (79)

At this section Elwes's English makes an explicit citation that the Latin text does not include. Most are translator clarifications; a few may indicate citation forms the Latin extractor has not yet learned to recognize. No editorial action is taken.